Review: The Walking Dead Season 2 TV series

Season 2 of "The Walking Dead" picks up where season 1 left off, with the survivors leaving Atlanta and heading towards Fort Benning. However, after a mishap on the highway, the group is forced to take refuge on a nearby farm, where they encounter a new group of survivors and face new challenges.

One of the main themes of season 2 is the breakdown of group dynamics. The group is forced to confront their own personal demons and secrets, leading to tension and conflict within the group. For example, Shane's jealousy towards Rick and his feelings for Lori create tension that ultimately leads to a violent confrontation. The tension between Dale and Shane also reaches a boiling point, resulting in a dramatic turn of events.

The farm setting also creates a sense of claustrophobia and tension, as the survivors are constantly under threat from the walkers that surround them. The group's efforts to secure the farm and defend themselves against the walkers create some of the most tense and thrilling moments of the season, such as the confrontation in the barn and the final battle at the end of the season.

The season also introduces several new characters, such as Hershel, Maggie, and Glenn's girlfriend, Maggie. Hershel, in particular, is a significant character, as he becomes a mentor and father figure to the group. His farm also provides a much-needed respite for the group, and his character arc, which includes his struggles with alcoholism and his relationship with his daughters, adds depth to the season's storyline.

Another significant aspect of season 2 is the continued exploration of the moral and ethical dilemmas that the survivors face in the post-apocalyptic world. The group's decisions regarding the fate of Randall, a survivor from another group, and the revelation that everyone is infected with the virus, add layers of complexity to the storyline and force the characters to confront their own beliefs and values.

Overall, season 2 of "The Walking Dead" is a tense and thrilling continuation of the series. The breakdown of group dynamics, the farm setting, the introduction of new characters, and the exploration of moral and ethical dilemmas all contribute to the season's strong storyline. Fans of the show will appreciate the continued development of their favorite characters and the introduction of new challenges and obstacles that keep the story fresh and exciting.

The Walking Dead: The Road to Woodbury: A Novel and Episode comparison

Last week I reviewed The Road to Woodbury series of books. Today we are going to compare them to the TV series episodes.

"The Walking Dead: The Road to Woodbury" is a popular book series that explores the backstory of one of the most notorious villains in "The Walking Dead" universe: the Governor. The series is written by Robert Kirkman and Jay Bonansinga, and follows the rise of the Governor as he gains control of the fortified town of Woodbury. The Governor is also a significant character in the TV show, where he is portrayed by David Morrissey. In this blog post, we'll take a closer look at how "The Walking Dead: The Road to Woodbury" books compare to the TV show.

One of the most significant differences between the books and the TV show is the portrayal of the Governor. In the books, the Governor is a much more nuanced and complex character than in the TV show. We see the Governor's backstory and how his experiences during the early days of the apocalypse shaped him into the man he would become. In contrast, the Governor in the TV show is a more one-dimensional villain, who is primarily motivated by a desire for power and control. While David Morrissey's performance as the Governor is impressive, the TV show's portrayal of the character lacks the depth and complexity of the books.

Another significant difference between the books and the TV show is the focus on different characters. The books introduce us to new characters like Lilly Caul and Bob Stookey, who play significant roles in the story. In contrast, the TV show focuses primarily on the main cast of characters, and some of the characters from the books, like Lilly Caul, are either absent or have their roles significantly reduced.

The TV show also diverges from the books in terms of the storyline. While the first season of the TV show loosely follows the events of the first book, "The Walking Dead: Rise of the Governor," subsequent seasons deviate significantly from the books. For example, in the TV show, the Governor's attack on the prison takes place much earlier in the storyline than in the books. The TV show also introduces new storylines and characters that are not present in the books, such as the character of Daryl Dixon.

Overall, while both the books and the TV show explore the same general story arc, there are significant differences between the two. The books offer a more in-depth and nuanced exploration of the Governor's backstory, as well as the stories of secondary characters like Lilly Caul. The TV show, on the other hand, focuses more on the main cast of characters and introduces new storylines and characters not present in the books. Both the books and the TV show have their strengths and weaknesses, and fans of "The Walking Dead" franchise may appreciate both for different reasons.

Review: The Walking Dead: The Road to Woodbury

"The Walking Dead: The Road to Woodbury" is a series of novels that explore the backstory of one of the most infamous antagonists of "The Walking Dead" universe: the Governor. Written by Robert Kirkman and Jay Bonansinga, the books are a dark and twisted journey into the mind of a man who will stop at nothing to maintain control in a world gone mad. In this blog post, we'll take a closer look at "The Walking Dead: The Road to Woodbury" and what makes it such a compelling addition to the franchise.

The first book in the series, "The Walking Dead: Rise of the Governor," introduces us to Philip Blake, a man who will one day become the Governor. The book follows Philip and his brother Brian as they struggle to survive in the early days of the zombie apocalypse. Along the way, they encounter a group of survivors who are in desperate need of leadership. Philip steps up to the plate, using his cunning and charisma to take control of the group and lead them to safety. However, as the group reaches the seemingly idyllic town of Woodbury, Philip's true nature begins to emerge.

The second book in the series, "The Walking Dead: The Road to Woodbury," picks up where the first book left off. Philip, now calling himself "the Governor," has taken control of Woodbury and turned it into a fortress. However, as the people of Woodbury begin to chafe under his rule, the Governor's grip on power begins to slip. Meanwhile, Lilly Caul, a survivor from the first book, arrives in Woodbury and begins to uncover the dark secrets that the Governor is hiding.

One of the strengths of "The Walking Dead: The Road to Woodbury" is its exploration of the Governor's character. In the TV show, the Governor is depicted as a one-dimensional villain, but in the books, he is a complex and deeply flawed human being. We see how his experiences in the early days of the apocalypse shaped him into the man he would become, and how his desperation to maintain control ultimately led to his downfall.

Another strength of the series is its focus on secondary characters. Lilly Caul, in particular, is a standout character, and her journey from a timid survivor to a fierce warrior is one of the most compelling arcs in the books. The series also introduces us to new characters like Bob Stookey, who would go on to play a significant role in the TV show.

Overall, "The Walking Dead: The Road to Woodbury" is a dark and gritty exploration of the human psyche in a world gone mad. With its nuanced characters and exploration of the Governor's backstory, the series is a must-read for any fan of "The Walking Dead" franchise. If you're looking for a dark and gripping post-apocalyptic tale, look no further than "The Walking Dead: The Road to Woodbury."

Review: The Walking Dead Season 1

"The Walking Dead" premiered on AMC in 2010, quickly becoming a cultural phenomenon and a ratings juggernaut. Based on the popular graphic novel series of the same name, the show follows a group of survivors in the aftermath of a zombie apocalypse. In this blog post, we'll take a closer look at the first season of "The Walking Dead" and what made it such a compelling and groundbreaking piece of television.

The first season of "The Walking Dead" consists of six episodes, which were all directed by Frank Darabont. The season begins with sheriff's deputy Rick Grimes waking up from a coma to find that the world he knew has been destroyed by a zombie outbreak. Rick sets out to find his family and other survivors, eventually coming across a group of survivors led by a man named Shane.

One of the most striking things about the first season of "The Walking Dead" is its cinematic quality. The show was shot on 16mm film, giving it a grainy, atmospheric look that sets it apart from other TV shows. The cinematography is frequently breathtaking, with a focus on the beauty and desolation of the post-apocalyptic landscape.

The show's use of zombies is also noteworthy. Rather than simply being mindless killing machines, the zombies in "The Walking Dead" are depicted as tragic figures, people who have been transformed into monsters by a cruel twist of fate. The show's makeup and special effects are top-notch, with the zombies looking realistic and terrifying.

Of course, what makes "The Walking Dead" truly great is its characters. Andrew Lincoln's performance as Rick Grimes is a standout, with the character's journey from a confused and vulnerable survivor to a leader who will do whatever it takes to protect his people being one of the show's most compelling arcs. The rest of the cast is equally strong, with actors like Sarah Wayne Callies, Jon Bernthal, and Steven Yeun bringing depth and humanity to their characters.

Overall, the first season of "The Walking Dead" is a stunning achievement in television. From its breathtaking cinematography to its nuanced character development, the show sets a high bar for zombie stories and post-apocalyptic fiction. If you haven't yet watched the first season of "The Walking Dead," we highly recommend it. It's a thrilling and emotional ride that's not to be missed.

Review: The Walking Dead graphic novel

"The Walking Dead" is a graphic novel series created by writer Robert Kirkman and artist Tony Moore. First published in 2003, the series has become one of the most popular and influential comics of the 21st century. Set in a world overrun by zombies, "The Walking Dead" tells the story of a group of survivors as they navigate the dangers of a post-apocalyptic landscape.

One of the most distinctive features of "The Walking Dead" is its focus on character development. While there are plenty of zombie kills and action sequences, the heart of the series lies in its complex and nuanced characters. From the series' protagonist, Rick Grimes, to its wide cast of supporting characters, each individual has their own backstory, motivations, and flaws.

The series also offers a realistic and grounded take on the zombie apocalypse. Unlike many other zombie stories, "The Walking Dead" emphasizes the difficulty of survival in a world where basic resources like food and shelter are scarce. The series also explores the psychological toll of living in a world where death is a constant presence.

Another key aspect of "The Walking Dead" is its exploration of morality and ethics in a lawless world. The series frequently raises questions about what it means to be a good person in a world where the rules have changed. Characters must make difficult choices about when to show mercy, when to take revenge, and when to sacrifice their own well-being for the greater good.

In addition to its compelling characters and thought-provoking themes, "The Walking Dead" is also notable for its visual style. The artwork by Tony Moore and later Charlie Adlard is gritty and realistic, with a focus on detail and texture that immerses readers in the post-apocalyptic world.

"The Walking Dead" has had a significant impact on the zombie genre, inspiring countless imitators and spin-offs. The series has also been adapted into a hit television show, which has become one of the most popular shows on television.

In conclusion, "The Walking Dead" is a must-read for fans of zombie stories and post-apocalyptic fiction. The series offers a unique take on the genre, with a focus on character development, realism, and ethical questions. With its gritty artwork and compelling storytelling, "The Walking Dead" has earned its place as one of the most influential and beloved comics of the 21st century.

World War Z: a book and movie comparison

World War Z continues to be one of my favorite movies. If it's on, I'll watch it. Even though fast zombies scare the crap out of me. The book is one of my favorites also, but if you've read/watched you know that they vary drastically. It's still good entertainment and storytelling in my opinion.

"World War Z" is a 2006 novel by Max Brooks that tells the story of a global zombie outbreak and its aftermath through a series of interviews with survivors. The book is widely regarded as a classic of the zombie genre, and its unique storytelling style has made it a favorite of readers around the world. In 2013, a movie adaptation was released, which departed significantly from the source material. In this blog post, we'll compare the book and movie versions of "World War Z".

The most significant departure from the book is the movie's focus on a single protagonist, Gerry Lane (played by Brad Pitt). In the book, there is no central character, and the story is told through the accounts of various survivors. This change fundamentally alters the nature of the story, shifting it from a collection of individual stories to a traditional action-adventure movie with a hero at its center.

Another significant difference is the portrayal of the zombies. In the book, the zombies are slow-moving and relatively easy to kill. They are a constant threat but are not presented as an unbeatable enemy. In the movie, the zombies are fast-moving and ferocious, capable of overwhelming even large military forces. This change creates a sense of urgency and danger that is absent from the book.

The movie also alters the tone of the story, emphasizing action and suspense over the book's more introspective and philosophical approach. While the book explores themes of survival, society, and human nature, the movie focuses more on thrilling set-pieces and suspenseful sequences.

Despite these differences, the movie does share some similarities with the book. Both versions of the story explore the global impact of a zombie outbreak and the ways in which different societies respond to the crisis. Both versions also examine the role of the military and government in responding to the outbreak.

While the movie adaptation of "World War Z" differs significantly from the book, it still manages to capture some of the essence of the original story. The movie offers a thrilling and suspenseful take on the zombie genre, while the book is a more thoughtful and introspective exploration of society, human nature, and survival. If you're a fan of zombie stories, both versions of "World War Z" are worth checking out, but they offer different experiences and perspectives.

I Am Legend: A Book and Movie comparison

I am a sucker for post-apocalyptic movies and books. One of my favorites is I Am Legend. I watched the movie multiple times since its release but I only just recently read the book.

"I Am Legend" is a 2007 post-apocalyptic movie starring Will Smith, based on the 1954 novel of the same name by Richard Matheson. While the movie takes many liberties with the original source material, it still manages to capture the essence of the novel and offers a unique perspective on the story.

The most significant departure from the book is the portrayal of the monsters. In the movie, they are not vampires but rather infected humans who exhibit zombie-like behavior. This change alters the dynamic between the protagonist, Robert Neville, and the monsters. In the book, Neville is the only human in a world of vampires, which makes him the ultimate outsider. In the movie, Neville is still isolated but is not the last human, which changes the dynamic of the story.

Despite the changes to the monsters, the movie still explores themes of isolation, morality, and survival. Will Smith's performance as Neville is powerful, capturing the desperation and loneliness of the character. The movie also examines the relationship between Neville and his dog, which serves as a source of comfort and companionship in a world devoid of human contact.

The movie also offers a unique perspective on the ending of the book. While the novel ends on a bleak note, with Neville being executed by the vampires, the movie offers a more hopeful conclusion. Neville sacrifices himself to save a group of survivors and discovers that a cure for the virus may exist. This change in the ending offers a glimmer of hope in an otherwise bleak world, providing a satisfying conclusion to the movie.

Overall, while the movie takes many liberties with the source material, it still manages to capture the essence of the novel. It explores similar themes and offers a unique perspective on the story. Will Smith's performance is excellent, and the movie's ending offers a satisfying conclusion. If you're a fan of the novel or post-apocalyptic movies in general, "I Am Legend" is worth a watch.